<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Internets,</title>
	<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/</link>
	<description>Blogging Keith Olbermann</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Either Relevant or True &#187; Backlash - Now In One Tidy Package!</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-7400</link>
		<dc:creator>Either Relevant or True &#187; Backlash - Now In One Tidy Package!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-7400</guid>
		<description>[...] Sklar, no KO fan she, cherry picks the one line about sexism missing the actual point Keith was making: Ms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sklar, no KO fan she, cherry picks the one line about sexism missing the actual point Keith was making: Ms. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6856</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6856</guid>
		<description>"We all know it was a metaphor."  Oh?  You're able to recognize a metaphor, are you?  This surprises me since you seem unable to recognize the hyperbole of my mock outrage, insisting instead that I'm taking this personally.  Honestly.  If I took every unkind word directed at Mr. Olbermann personally I'd be a withered husk of a woman, too bereft of self-esteem to run my little blog.  (Especially since the man is far from perfect and seems intent on saying or doing something stupid and/or egotistical on a regular basis.  I find this to be part of his charm.)

What I am genuinely outraged about is how this protracted primary season has caused normally rational individuals who agree to become hateful fools spewing petty invective at one another.  I find it tiring to see Democrats eating their own when there is work to be done.  If this is the point on which you believe I should get over myself, well "nobama," that speaks more about you than it does me.

I suggest that if you don't care for Mr. Olbermann or his program - or me, for that matter - then perhaps you might do well to seek other virtual pastures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We all know it was a metaphor.&#8221;  Oh?  You&#8217;re able to recognize a metaphor, are you?  This surprises me since you seem unable to recognize the hyperbole of my mock outrage, insisting instead that I&#8217;m taking this personally.  Honestly.  If I took every unkind word directed at Mr. Olbermann personally I&#8217;d be a withered husk of a woman, too bereft of self-esteem to run my little blog.  (Especially since the man is far from perfect and seems intent on saying or doing something stupid and/or egotistical on a regular basis.  I find this to be part of his charm.)</p>
<p>What I am genuinely outraged about is how this protracted primary season has caused normally rational individuals who agree to become hateful fools spewing petty invective at one another.  I find it tiring to see Democrats eating their own when there is work to be done.  If this is the point on which you believe I should get over myself, well &#8220;nobama,&#8221; that speaks more about you than it does me.</p>
<p>I suggest that if you don&#8217;t care for Mr. Olbermann or his program - or me, for that matter - then perhaps you might do well to seek other virtual pastures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobama</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6855</link>
		<dc:creator>nobama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6855</guid>
		<description>Oh come on. We all know it was a metaphor, but we all also know that if Billo, Coultergiest, Beck or Comedian Rush Limbaugh had used the EXACT SAME metaphor, they'd have headlined WPITW that night.

If any of them had uttered that lame non-apology "I'm sorry you misunderstood me". They'd have been right back up there again for another round. 


Get over yourself, Becky. Why do you take this so personally anyway? 

And the reason "no one" was talking about it until Rachel Sklar's article on Huffpo showed up is because those people (like me, a one time Countdown fan) Don't Watch Countdown (anymore). And it's hypocritical comments and non-apologies like this even that caused me to stop watching Countdown.  

Talk about needing to get over yourself; Keith, we're looking at YOU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on. We all know it was a metaphor, but we all also know that if Billo, Coultergiest, Beck or Comedian Rush Limbaugh had used the EXACT SAME metaphor, they&#8217;d have headlined WPITW that night.</p>
<p>If any of them had uttered that lame non-apology &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry you misunderstood me&#8221;. They&#8217;d have been right back up there again for another round. </p>
<p>Get over yourself, Becky. Why do you take this so personally anyway? </p>
<p>And the reason &#8220;no one&#8221; was talking about it until Rachel Sklar&#8217;s article on Huffpo showed up is because those people (like me, a one time Countdown fan) Don&#8217;t Watch Countdown (anymore). And it&#8217;s hypocritical comments and non-apologies like this even that caused me to stop watching Countdown.  </p>
<p>Talk about needing to get over yourself; Keith, we&#8217;re looking at YOU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafismom</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6847</link>
		<dc:creator>rafismom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6847</guid>
		<description>I did note Keith's use of the feminine pronoun when he said it and was only surprised that he would specify Hillary instead of leaving it up in the air,  but I assumed that he meant her because she was continuing to push this boulder ala Sisyphus when the wheels had already come off her cart.  I never thought of it as sexist or connoting violence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did note Keith&#8217;s use of the feminine pronoun when he said it and was only surprised that he would specify Hillary instead of leaving it up in the air,  but I assumed that he meant her because she was continuing to push this boulder ala Sisyphus when the wheels had already come off her cart.  I never thought of it as sexist or connoting violence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olberfann54321</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6846</link>
		<dc:creator>olberfann54321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6846</guid>
		<description>To spread a little love: video of KO and Richard Lewis 4/27/08 at 92Y St:

http://blog.92y.org/index.php/weblog/item/richard_lewis_and_keith_olbermann_word_in_edgewise/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To spread a little love: video of KO and Richard Lewis 4/27/08 at 92Y St:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.92y.org/index.php/weblog/item/richard_lewis_and_keith_olbermann_word_in_edgewise/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.92y.org/index.php/weblog/item/richard_lewis_and_keith_olbermann_word_in_edgewise/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicating</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6844</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6844</guid>
		<description>And, yeah, it came out a bit crude. But the guy apologized...I know *we* think he's Superman, but he can't *really* stop time and take it back.
(Without compromising his newscaster identity at least.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, yeah, it came out a bit crude. But the guy apologized&#8230;I know *we* think he&#8217;s Superman, but he can&#8217;t *really* stop time and take it back.<br />
(Without compromising his newscaster identity at least.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicating</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6843</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6843</guid>
		<description>Go, Leona! Righteous Comment, that.
And, no, supporting Obama(via Edwards) doesn't mean I find those fricking nutcrackers funny, or that I think Women in Power=ew.(I'd vote for Rachel Maddow in a hot minute...)
So, basically, what Orin said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go, Leona! Righteous Comment, that.<br />
And, no, supporting Obama(via Edwards) doesn&#8217;t mean I find those fricking nutcrackers funny, or that I think Women in Power=ew.(I&#8217;d vote for Rachel Maddow in a hot minute&#8230;)<br />
So, basically, what Orin said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orin "Leona" English</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>Orin "Leona" English</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>Becky, you and I have had many a disagreement over time, but in this one, I support you 100 percent. The amount of faux outrage currently being exhibited by pseudo-"feminist" supporters of Hillary Clinton over anything negative about the woman that happens to issue from Keith's mouth has reached the point of utter ridiculousness.

This isn't feminism--not second wave, third wave or any other kind of wave. It's a pathetic tossed bucket of water, accompanied by cries of "Sexist!," from women who wouldn't know sexism if it denied them a job, deprived them of decent day care for their kids, or paid them less than a man. But when they hear "two people go into a room and only one comes out" from Keith, and one of those people just happens to be Hillary, WHAM! Sexism from the lips of Misogynist King Keith!

If you don't mind my saying so, these tend to be the same kind of women who initially got their knickers in a knot with him for devoting so many of his #1 stories to ridiculing the latest Blond Celebutard of the Week. Keith said something that implied Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, etc., is stupid and slutty? OH NOES!!!! Time to grab the pots and pans and have a protest to defend this paragon of womanhood from the mudslinging of men!

Totally ignored is the fact that Keith is pretty much willing to ridicule ANY celebrity who strikes him as intellectually vacuous and relationally promiscuous...male or female. He slings it at Paris for being a slut who made a sex video. He slings it at Rush for being married a brazillion times and going to the Dominican Republic with a case of Viagra and no companion. He puts the laugh on brainless actors, musicians and ex-boy-band members with regularity. Yet...let him aim his snark at a blonde starlet or professional heiress and all of a sudden he's a sexist pig creep.

Is Keith perfect? Nah. Has he probably still got a lot to learn about the world and life (despite the fact that he appears to regard himself now as the King of Having It All Together, fully qualified to counsel other poor sadsacks on how they can find true eternal happiness in work, love and life, "just like I finally have")? Yeah, I think so. But his basic integrity I don't doubt. And I am at the point in this presidential race that I am heartily sick of anyone and EVERYONE even peripherally involved having every word that comes out of their mouth analyzed as a possible "gotcha" career ender. That goes not only for Keith but for Obama, both the Clintons and everyone having anything to do with them (including Jeremiah Wright). Enough already! (Well, OK, I admit that as far as McCain's concerned, I'd like to see someone do even a FRACTION of criticizing what he says that causes him the slightest hiccup of real attention and concern.)

If Hillary Clinton's band of extremist so-called feminist supporters put half the effort into fighting for true feminist causes that they do into seeking offense at every turn of a phrase, we would all be getting equal pay for equal work, every man would be getting paternity leave and the   "glass ceiling" would be shattered into more little pieces than James Frey's reputation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becky, you and I have had many a disagreement over time, but in this one, I support you 100 percent. The amount of faux outrage currently being exhibited by pseudo-&#8221;feminist&#8221; supporters of Hillary Clinton over anything negative about the woman that happens to issue from Keith&#8217;s mouth has reached the point of utter ridiculousness.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t feminism&#8211;not second wave, third wave or any other kind of wave. It&#8217;s a pathetic tossed bucket of water, accompanied by cries of &#8220;Sexist!,&#8221; from women who wouldn&#8217;t know sexism if it denied them a job, deprived them of decent day care for their kids, or paid them less than a man. But when they hear &#8220;two people go into a room and only one comes out&#8221; from Keith, and one of those people just happens to be Hillary, WHAM! Sexism from the lips of Misogynist King Keith!</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t mind my saying so, these tend to be the same kind of women who initially got their knickers in a knot with him for devoting so many of his #1 stories to ridiculing the latest Blond Celebutard of the Week. Keith said something that implied Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, etc., is stupid and slutty? OH NOES!!!! Time to grab the pots and pans and have a protest to defend this paragon of womanhood from the mudslinging of men!</p>
<p>Totally ignored is the fact that Keith is pretty much willing to ridicule ANY celebrity who strikes him as intellectually vacuous and relationally promiscuous&#8230;male or female. He slings it at Paris for being a slut who made a sex video. He slings it at Rush for being married a brazillion times and going to the Dominican Republic with a case of Viagra and no companion. He puts the laugh on brainless actors, musicians and ex-boy-band members with regularity. Yet&#8230;let him aim his snark at a blonde starlet or professional heiress and all of a sudden he&#8217;s a sexist pig creep.</p>
<p>Is Keith perfect? Nah. Has he probably still got a lot to learn about the world and life (despite the fact that he appears to regard himself now as the King of Having It All Together, fully qualified to counsel other poor sadsacks on how they can find true eternal happiness in work, love and life, &#8220;just like I finally have&#8221;)? Yeah, I think so. But his basic integrity I don&#8217;t doubt. And I am at the point in this presidential race that I am heartily sick of anyone and EVERYONE even peripherally involved having every word that comes out of their mouth analyzed as a possible &#8220;gotcha&#8221; career ender. That goes not only for Keith but for Obama, both the Clintons and everyone having anything to do with them (including Jeremiah Wright). Enough already! (Well, OK, I admit that as far as McCain&#8217;s concerned, I&#8217;d like to see someone do even a FRACTION of criticizing what he says that causes him the slightest hiccup of real attention and concern.)</p>
<p>If Hillary Clinton&#8217;s band of extremist so-called feminist supporters put half the effort into fighting for true feminist causes that they do into seeking offense at every turn of a phrase, we would all be getting equal pay for equal work, every man would be getting paternity leave and the   &#8220;glass ceiling&#8221; would be shattered into more little pieces than James Frey&#8217;s reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiggityDawg</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6839</link>
		<dc:creator>DiggityDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6839</guid>
		<description>I don't have a lot to add, as I think everyone else has pretty much nailed this one.

It blows my mind that some people have taken KO's comment literally, when it should be obvious to anyone older than 5 with a functioning brain that it's just a phrase. Everytime I think this country couldn't get more stupid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a lot to add, as I think everyone else has pretty much nailed this one.</p>
<p>It blows my mind that some people have taken KO&#8217;s comment literally, when it should be obvious to anyone older than 5 with a functioning brain that it&#8217;s just a phrase. Everytime I think this country couldn&#8217;t get more stupid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vickita</title>
		<link>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6838</link>
		<dc:creator>Vickita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bloggingolbermann.com/2008/04/dear-internets/#comment-6838</guid>
		<description>Girl, I *cannot* watch the MSM right now without my head exploding.  I am getting all of my news from Countdown, &lt;i&gt;Newsweek&lt;/i&gt; (Fineman and Jon Meacham != head explosion), and Washington Week (ibid, Gwen Ifill).  I don't count the Daily Show as news, because by the time it shows up on TDS, it's usually not, strictly speaking, "news" anymore.

I don't think it'll end after the primaries, because then we'll have the Rs to deal with, although maybe it'll hurt less when it isn't coming from *our own damned people*.

*sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Girl, I *cannot* watch the MSM right now without my head exploding.  I am getting all of my news from Countdown, <i>Newsweek</i> (Fineman and Jon Meacham != head explosion), and Washington Week (ibid, Gwen Ifill).  I don&#8217;t count the Daily Show as news, because by the time it shows up on TDS, it&#8217;s usually not, strictly speaking, &#8220;news&#8221; anymore.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll end after the primaries, because then we&#8217;ll have the Rs to deal with, although maybe it&#8217;ll hurt less when it isn&#8217;t coming from *our own damned people*.</p>
<p>*sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.657 seconds -->
